"Edouard Poor" <pov### [at] edouardinfo> wrote:
> stbenge <THI### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > Edouard Poor wrote:
> > > Just replace the "inside()" call in Sam's fastprox macros with my "inside_m()"
> > > (or your own more complete macro)
> >
> > Would you care to elaborate on what a "more complete macro" might
> > entail? If there are improvements I can make before my next release, I
> > will consider them as long as they don't make the macro too complex for
> > the end user (of course, it might already be too late...).
>
> Just the inside_vector improvement I think.
>
> Imagine if you had a mesh height field - if you chose an inside_vector that
> pointed "up", then your fastprox macros would work on it, even though it's an
> open object. My inside_m() macro just uses x as the test direction.

You guys are friggin' amazin'! XD

Post a reply to this message